作者:dre4merp
本文为作者投稿,Seebug Paper 期待你的分享,凡经采用即有礼品相送! 投稿邮箱:[email protected]
本文更多的是根据调试Windows Server 2003,分析漏洞成因。
阅读本文需要一定的Kerberos基础知识、Windows源码阅读调试能力。单纯的阅读可能并不能完全理解其中的关键点,需要进行调试理解。
漏洞编号为:CVE-2021-42278
和 CVE-2021-42287
CVE-2021-42278:通常情况下,机器账户应以$结尾,即DC$
。
但是AD域并没有对其进行强校验。通过建立与域控同名却不以$结尾的机器账户,即DC
,对域控进行欺骗。
CVE-2021-42287:利用上述漏洞进行欺骗,请求到DC的TGT后,修改自身的机器账号。之后,利用Kerberos的S4U2Self机制,请求对于“自己”(DC
)的ST,但是由于此时机器名已经被修改而无法找到DC
,域控将会用DC$
的Key进行加密,并向其中添加请求的账户名的PAC。至此便得到了高权限ST。
域控:Windows Server 2003 Debug版
攻击机:Windows 7 x64 SP1
武器化工具:https://github.com/cube0x0/noPac
使用SysinternalsSuite中的ADExplorer64工具查看域内的所有机器账户
从上图中可以很明确的看到域控的机器名为WINSRVSERVER$
,之后会使用WINSRVSERVER
作为机器账户名进行欺骗。
相关准备工作不是本文重点,可以在noPac项目中学习
//new machine account
NewMachineAccount(argContainer, argDistinguishedName, argDomain, argDomainController, argMachineAccount, argMachinePassword, argVerbose, argRandom, credential);
//clean spn
SetMachineAccountAttribute(argContainer, argDistinguishedName, argDomain, argDomainController, "serviceprincipalname", argMachineAccount, "", false, true, argVerbose, credential);
//set samaccountname
SetMachineAccountAttribute(argContainer, argDistinguishedName, argDomain, argDomainController, "samaccountname", argMachineAccount, argDomainController.Split('.')[0], false, false, argVerbose, credential);
申请TGT时是根据修改后的机器账号WINSRVSERVER
进行申请的。
域控调用I_GetASTicket
处理AS_REQ
消息
首先会调用KdcNormalize
获得账户的相关信息包括UserInfo
、ClientTicketInfo
等
!!!请谨记这个函数,之后的漏洞利用过程会展开分析!!!
KerbErr = KdcNormalize(
ClientName,
NULL,
RequestRealm,
NULL, // no source ticket
NameFlags | KDC_NAME_CLIENT | KDC_NAME_FOLLOW_REFERRALS | KDC_NAME_CHECK_GC,
FALSE, // do not restrict user accounts (user2user)
&ClientReferral,
ClientRealm,
&ClientTicketInfo,
pExtendedError,
&UserHandle,
WhichFields,
0L,
&UserInfo,
&GroupMembership
);
通过上面获得的ClientTicketInfo
调用BuildTicketAS
生成TGT,堆栈如下
kd> kc
#
00 KDCSVC!BuildTicketAS
01 KDCSVC!I_GetASTicket
02 KDCSVC!KdcGetTicket
03 KDCSVC!KdcAtqIoCompletion
04 NTDSATQ!ATQ_CONTEXT::IOCompletion
05 NTDSATQ!AtqpProcessContext
06 NTDSATQ!AtqPoolThread
07 kernel32!BaseThreadStart
查看参数ClientTicketInfo和ClientName可以看到此次是以WINSRVSERVER
的身份去申请TGT。
kd> dt ClientTicketInfo
Local var @ 0x332fa00 Type _KDC_TICKET_INFO*
0x0332fcb4
+0x000 AccountName : _UNICODE_STRING "WINSRVSERVER"
+0x008 TrustedForest : _UNICODE_STRING ""
+0x010 PasswordExpires : _LARGE_INTEGER 0x7fffffff`ffffffff
+0x018 fTicketOpts : 0x7b
+0x01c UserAccountControl : 0x80
+0x020 UserId : 0x472
+0x024 TrustType : 0
+0x028 TrustAttributes : 0
+0x02c Passwords : 0x0015eab8 _KERB_STORED_CREDENTIAL
+0x030 OldPasswords : 0x001522d0 _KERB_STORED_CREDENTIAL
+0x034 TrustSid : (null)
+0x038 PasswordVersion : 1
+0x03c LockoutThreshold : 0
kd> dt ClientName
Local var @ 0x332fa04 Type KERB_PRINCIPAL_NAME*
0x00084c44
+0x000 name_type : 0n1
+0x004 name_string : 0x000c3360 KERB_PRINCIPAL_NAME_name_string_s
kd> dx -id 0,0,89c47a68 -r1 ((KDCSVC!KERB_PRINCIPAL_NAME_name_string_s *)0xc3360)
((KDCSVC!KERB_PRINCIPAL_NAME_name_string_s *)0xc3360) : 0xc3360 [Type: KERB_PRINCIPAL_NAME_name_string_s *]
[+0x000] next : 0x0 [Type: KERB_PRINCIPAL_NAME_name_string_s *]
[+0x004] value : 0xb45d8 : "WINSRVSERVER" [Type: char *]
上述函数工作完成后,查看生成的Ticket,即TGT
kd> dt KERB_ENCRYPTED_TICKET 0x332fabc
KDCSVC!KERB_ENCRYPTED_TICKET
+0x000 bit_mask : 0xc0
+0x000 o : [1] "???"
+0x004 flags : tagASN1bitstring_t
+0x00c key : KERB_ENCRYPTION_KEY
+0x018 client_realm : 0x000c5098 "WINTESTYU03.COM"
+0x01c client_name : KERB_PRINCIPAL_NAME
+0x024 transited : KERB_TRANSITED_ENCODING
+0x030 authtime : tagASN1generalizedtime_t
+0x03e starttime : tagASN1generalizedtime_t
+0x04c endtime : tagASN1generalizedtime_t
+0x05a renew_until : tagASN1generalizedtime_t
+0x068 client_addresses : (null)
+0x06c authorization_data : (null)
此时还没有向其中添加PAC,会通过之前获得的UserInfo
调用KdcGetPacAuthData
生成所需的PAC
此时的PAC为WINSRVSERVER
的PAC,属于正常流程
kd> dt AuthorizationData
Local var @ 0x332f9d0 Type PKERB_AUTHORIZATION_DATA_s
+0x000 next : (null)
+0x004 value : PKERB_AUTHORIZATION_DATA_Seq
kd> dx -id 0,0,89c47a68 -r1 (*((KDCSVC!PKERB_AUTHORIZATION_DATA_Seq *)0x332f9d4))
(*((KDCSVC!PKERB_AUTHORIZATION_DATA_Seq *)0x332f9d4)) [Type: PKERB_AUTHORIZATION_DATA_Seq]
[+0x000] auth_data_type : 128 [Type: long]
[+0x004] auth_data [Type: tagASN1octetstring_t]
kd> dx -id 0,0,89c47a68 -r1 (*((KDCSVC!tagASN1octetstring_t *)0x332f9d8))
(*((KDCSVC!tagASN1octetstring_t *)0x332f9d8)) [Type: tagASN1octetstring_t]
[+0x000] length : 0x260 [Type: unsigned long]
[+0x004] value : 0x16c828 : 0x4 [Type: unsigned char *]
kd> db 0x16c828 l 260
0016c828 04 00 00 00 00 00 00 00-01 00 00 00 c0 01 00 00 ................
0016c838 48 00 00 00 00 00 00 00-0a 00 00 00 22 00 00 00 H..........."...
0016c848 08 02 00 00 00 00 00 00-06 00 00 00 14 00 00 00 ................
0016c858 30 02 00 00 00 00 00 00-07 00 00 00 14 00 00 00 0...............
0016c868 48 02 00 00 00 00 00 00-01 10 08 00 cc cc cc cc H...............
0016c878 b0 01 00 00 00 00 00 00-00 00 02 00 c2 dd c3 d9 ................
0016c888 0f f7 d7 01 ff ff ff ff-ff ff ff 7f ff ff ff ff ................
0016c898 ff ff ff 7f 56 b9 d8 d7-0f f7 d7 01 56 79 42 02 ....V.......VyB.
0016c8a8 d9 f7 d7 01 ff ff ff ff-ff ff ff 7f 18 00 18 00 ................
0016c8b8 04 00 02 00 00 00 00 00-08 00 02 00 00 00 00 00 ................
0016c8c8 0c 00 02 00 00 00 00 00-10 00 02 00 00 00 00 00 ................
0016c8d8 14 00 02 00 00 00 00 00-18 00 02 00 01 00 00 00 ................
0016c8e8 72 04 00 00 03 02 00 00-01 00 00 00 1c 00 02 00 r...............
0016c8f8 20 00 00 00 00 00 00 00-00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 ...............
0016c908 00 00 00 00 18 00 1a 00-20 00 02 00 16 00 18 00 ........ .......
0016c918 24 00 02 00 28 00 02 00-00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 $...(...........
0016c928 80 00 00 00 00 00 00 00-00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 ................
0016c938 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00-00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 ................
0016c948 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00-00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 ................
0016c958 00 00 00 00 0c 00 00 00-00 00 00 00 0c 00 00 00 ................
0016c968 57 00 49 00 4e 00 53 00-52 00 56 00 53 00 45 00 W.I.N.S.R.V.S.E.
0016c978 52 00 56 00 45 00 52 00-00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 R.V.E.R.........
0016c988 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00-00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 ................
0016c998 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00-00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 ................
0016c9a8 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00-00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 ................
0016c9b8 00 00 00 00 01 00 00 00-03 02 00 00 07 00 00 00 ................
0016c9c8 0d 00 00 00 00 00 00 00-0c 00 00 00 57 00 49 00 ............W.I.
0016c9d8 4e 00 53 00 52 00 56 00-53 00 45 00 52 00 56 00 N.S.R.V.S.E.R.V.
0016c9e8 45 00 52 00 0c 00 00 00-00 00 00 00 0b 00 00 00 E.R.............
0016c9f8 52 00 45 00 4e 00 50 00-45 00 4e 00 47 00 59 00 W.I.N.T.E.S.T.Y.
0016ca08 55 00 30 00 33 00 00 00-04 00 00 00 01 04 00 00 U.0.3...........
0016ca18 00 00 00 05 15 00 00 00-db ac e2 f8 a5 b2 f3 d1 ................
0016ca28 a1 c4 3e 10 00 00 00 00-00 b4 a3 e5 0f f7 d7 01 ..>.............
0016ca38 18 00 57 00 49 00 4e 00-53 00 52 00 56 00 53 00 ..W.I.N.S.R.V.S.
0016ca48 45 00 52 00 56 00 45 00-52 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 E.R.V.E.R.......
0016ca58 76 ff ff ff c1 fc e6 ad-46 30 3f 05 5e ed 74 c0 v.......F0?.^.t.
0016ca68 20 7d c9 54 00 00 00 00-76 ff ff ff 42 e1 22 e3 }.T....v...B.".
0016ca78 3b 44 cd ee b7 d7 50 5f-2d f9 44 ab 00 00 00 00 ;D....P_-.D.....
之后便是将PAC放入TGT中,将其打包并使用krbtgt
密钥进行加密,通过AS_REP
消息传递回Client
关键代码如下,不再展开分析
KerbErr = BuildReply(
&ClientTicketInfo,
(Nonce != 0) ? Nonce : RequestBody->nonce,
&Ticket.server_name,
Ticket.realm,
((RequestBody->bit_mask & addresses_present) != 0) ? RequestBody->addresses : NULL,
&Ticket,
&ReplyBody
);
...
KerbErr = KerbPackTicket(
&Ticket,
ServerKey,
ServiceTicketInfo.PasswordVersion,
&Reply.ticket
);
...
KerbErr = KerbPackKdcReplyBody(
&ReplyBody,
(EncryptionKey.keyvalue.value != NULL) ? &EncryptionKey : ClientKey,
(EncryptionKey.keyvalue.value != NULL) ? KERB_NO_KEY_VERSION : ClientTicketInfo.PasswordVersion,
KERB_TGS_REP_SALT,
KERB_ENCRYPTED_AS_REPLY_PDU,
&Reply.encrypted_part
);
还原机器账户名的目的是使得域控处理TGS_REQ
请求的时候,找不到账户从而是用自己的Key加密
//undo samaccountname change
SetMachineAccountAttribute(argContainer, argDistinguishedName, argDomain, argDomainController, "samaccountname", argMachineAccount, argMachineAccount, false, false, argVerbose, credential);
Client向域控申请WINSRVSERVER
的服务票据,域控在HandleTGSRequest
函数中处理TGS_REQ
请求。
首先通过KerbFindPreAuthDataEntry
获取TGS_REQ
中包含的ApRequest
ApRequest = KerbFindPreAuthDataEntry(
KRB5_PADATA_TGS_REQ,
RequestMessage->KERB_KDC_REQUEST_preauth_data
);
之后便是解析获得的APRequest
获得解密后的TGT
//验证请求。这包括对AP请求进行解码,找到合适的密钥来解密票据,并检查票据。
KerbErr = KdcVerifyKdcRequest(
ApRequest->preauth_data.value,
ApRequest->preauth_data.length,
ClientAddress,
TRUE, // this is a kdc request
&UnmarshalledApRequest,
&UnmarshalledAuthenticator,
&SourceEncryptPart,
&ReplyKey,
&SourceTicketKey,
&ServerTicketInfo,
&UseSubKey,
pExtendedError
);
KdcVerifyKdcRequest做了以下几件事情
查看这个函数的结果,获得了传过来的明文TGT
和krbtgt
的相关服务信息
kd> dt ServerTicketInfo
Local var @ 0x327fc48 Type _KDC_TICKET_INFO
+0x000 AccountName : _UNICODE_STRING "krbtgt"
+0x008 TrustedForest : _UNICODE_STRING ""
+0x010 PasswordExpires : _LARGE_INTEGER 0x7fffffff`ffffffff
+0x018 fTicketOpts : 0x7b
+0x01c UserAccountControl : 0x11
+0x020 UserId : 0x1f6
+0x024 TrustType : 0
+0x028 TrustAttributes : 0
+0x02c Passwords : 0x00084bf0 _KERB_STORED_CREDENTIAL
+0x030 OldPasswords : 0x000c4010 _KERB_STORED_CREDENTIAL
+0x034 TrustSid : (null)
+0x038 PasswordVersion : 2
+0x03c LockoutThreshold : 0
kd> dt SourceEncryptPart
Local var @ 0x327fdd0 Type KERB_ENCRYPTED_TICKET*
0x000fcf90
+0x000 bit_mask : 0xd0
+0x000 o : [1] "???"
+0x004 flags : tagASN1bitstring_t
+0x00c key : KERB_ENCRYPTION_KEY
+0x018 client_realm : 0x00106a18 "WINTESTYU03.COM"
+0x01c client_name : KERB_PRINCIPAL_NAME
+0x024 transited : KERB_TRANSITED_ENCODING
+0x030 authtime : tagASN1generalizedtime_t
+0x03e starttime : tagASN1generalizedtime_t
+0x04c endtime : tagASN1generalizedtime_t
+0x05a renew_until : tagASN1generalizedtime_t
+0x068 client_addresses : (null)
+0x06c authorization_data : 0x000c3370 PKERB_AUTHORIZATION_DATA_s
kd> db authorization_data l 276
0017f168 30 82 02 72 30 82 02 6e-a0 04 02 02 00 80 a1 82 0..r0..n........
0017f178 02 64 04 82 02 60 04 00-00 00 00 00 00 00 01 00 .d...`..........
0017f188 00 00 c0 01 00 00 48 00-00 00 00 00 00 00 0a 00 ......H.........
0017f198 00 00 22 00 00 00 08 02-00 00 00 00 00 00 06 00 ..".............
0017f1a8 00 00 14 00 00 00 30 02-00 00 00 00 00 00 07 00 ......0.........
0017f1b8 00 00 14 00 00 00 48 02-00 00 00 00 00 00 01 10 ......H.........
0017f1c8 08 00 cc cc cc cc b0 01-00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 ................
0017f1d8 02 00 02 4e 81 c8 1c f7-d7 01 ff ff ff ff ff ff ...N............
0017f1e8 ff 7f ff ff ff ff ff ff-ff 7f 56 b9 d8 d7 0f f7 ..........V.....
0017f1f8 d7 01 56 79 42 02 d9 f7-d7 01 ff ff ff ff ff ff ..VyB...........
0017f208 ff 7f 18 00 18 00 04 00-02 00 00 00 00 00 08 00 ................
0017f218 02 00 00 00 00 00 0c 00-02 00 00 00 00 00 10 00 ................
0017f228 02 00 00 00 00 00 14 00-02 00 00 00 00 00 18 00 ................
0017f238 02 00 08 00 00 00 72 04-00 00 03 02 00 00 01 00 ......r.........
0017f248 00 00 1c 00 02 00 20 00-00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 ...... .........
0017f258 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00-00 00 18 00 1a 00 20 00 .............. .
0017f268 02 00 16 00 18 00 24 00-02 00 28 00 02 00 00 00 ......$...(.....
0017f278 00 00 00 00 00 00 80 00-00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 ................
0017f288 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00-00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 ................
0017f298 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00-00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 ................
0017f2a8 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00-00 00 0c 00 00 00 00 00 ................
0017f2b8 00 00 0c 00 00 00 57 00-49 00 4e 00 53 00 52 00 ......W.I.N.S.R.
0017f2c8 56 00 53 00 45 00 52 00-56 00 45 00 52 00 00 00 V.S.E.R.V.E.R...
0017f2d8 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00-00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 ................
0017f2e8 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00-00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 ................
0017f2f8 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00-00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 ................
0017f308 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00-00 00 01 00 00 00 03 02 ................
0017f318 00 00 07 00 00 00 0d 00-00 00 00 00 00 00 0c 00 ................
0017f328 00 00 57 00 49 00 4e 00-53 00 52 00 56 00 53 00 ..W.I.N.S.R.V.S.
0017f338 45 00 52 00 56 00 45 00-52 00 0c 00 00 00 00 00 E.R.V.E.R.......
0017f348 00 00 0b 00 00 00 52 00-45 00 4e 00 50 00 45 00 ......W.I.N.T.E.
0017f358 4e 00 47 00 59 00 55 00-30 00 33 00 00 00 04 00 S.T.Y.U.0.3.....
0017f368 00 00 01 04 00 00 00 00-00 05 15 00 00 00 db ac ................
0017f378 e2 f8 a5 b2 f3 d1 a1 c4-3e 10 00 00 00 00 00 06 ........>.......
0017f388 7d ec a5 f7 d7 01 18 00-57 00 49 00 4e 00 53 00 }.......W.I.N.S.
0017f398 52 00 56 00 53 00 45 00-52 00 56 00 45 00 52 00 R.V.S.E.R.V.E.R.
0017f3a8 00 00 00 00 00 00 76 ff-ff ff 51 30 b4 c6 f1 8c ......v...Q0....
0017f3b8 bf 3d 01 2f 7c 3d 75 9b-9d 8d 00 00 00 00 76 ff .=./|=u.......v.
0017f3c8 ff ff 5a 8c df 90 88 38-ec 5d 6c 61 b8 46 bd bf ..Z....8.]la.F..
0017f3d8 99 5c 00 00 00 00 .\....
之后会获取请求的相关信息
KerbErr = KerbConvertPrincipalNameToKdcName(
&ServerName,
&RequestBody->KERB_KDC_REQUEST_BODY_server_name
);
KerbErr = KerbConvertPrincipalNameToKdcName(
&SourceClientName,
&SourceEncryptPart->client_name
);
KerbErr = KerbConvertRealmToUnicodeString(
&SourceClientRealm,
&SourceEncryptPart->client_realm
);
内容分别如下
kd> dt ServerName
Local var @ 0x327fdd8 Type _KERB_INTERNAL_NAME*
0x00117610
+0x000 NameType : 0n1
+0x002 NameCount : 1
+0x004 Names : [1] _UNICODE_STRING "WINSRVSERVER"
kd> dt SourceClientName
Local var @ 0x327fdd4 Type _KERB_INTERNAL_NAME*
0x0017f3e8
+0x000 NameType : 0n1
+0x002 NameCount : 1
+0x004 Names : [1] _UNICODE_STRING "WINSRVSERVER"
kd> dt SourceClientRealm
Local var @ 0x327fdc4 Type _UNICODE_STRING
"WINTESTYU03.COM"
+0x000 Length : 0x1e
+0x002 MaximumLength : 0x20
+0x004 Buffer : 0x00153578 "WINTESTYU03.COM"
之后会调用KdcFindS4UClientAndRealm
来获取PA_DATA_FOR_USER
这个结构中的内容
KdcFindS4UClientAndRealm
函数会解析PaList
并将其转换成KERB_PA_FOR_USER
结构,目前需要注意的便是其中的userName
是我们要请求的高权限用户的用户名Administrator
kd> dt S4URequest
Local var @ 0x327f9b0 Type KERB_PA_FOR_USER*
0x0012aaa8
+0x000 bit_mask : 0
+0x000 o : [1] ""
+0x004 userName : KERB_PRINCIPAL_NAME
+0x00c userRealm : 0x0012abf0 "WINTESTYU03.COM"
+0x010 cksum : KERB_CHECKSUM
+0x01c authentication_package : 0x000fca30 "Kerberos"
+0x020 authorization_data : tagASN1octetstring_t
kd> dx -id 0,0,89de1678 -r1 (*((KDCSVC!KERB_PRINCIPAL_NAME *)0x12aaac))
(*((KDCSVC!KERB_PRINCIPAL_NAME *)0x12aaac)) [Type: KERB_PRINCIPAL_NAME]
[+0x000] name_type : 10 [Type: long]
[+0x004] name_string : 0x82c98 [Type: KERB_PRINCIPAL_NAME_name_string_s *]
kd> dx -id 0,0,89de1678 -r1 ((KDCSVC!KERB_PRINCIPAL_NAME_name_string_s *)0x82c98)
((KDCSVC!KERB_PRINCIPAL_NAME_name_string_s *)0x82c98) : 0x82c98 [Type: KERB_PRINCIPAL_NAME_name_string_s *]
[+0x000] next : 0x0 [Type: KERB_PRINCIPAL_NAME_name_string_s *]
[+0x004] value : 0x159c88 : "wintestServer" [Type: char *]
之后会通过KdcNormalize
获取我们自身WINSRVSERVER
的相关信息
其中的关键调用如下:
对于漏洞的利用便发生在这个函数中,并且利用了两次。
第一次实现了将申请的用户转换为域控上的Administrator
第二次实现了将申请的服务转换成WINSRVSERVER$
下面将详细分析漏洞点。
KERBERR
KdcNormalize(
IN PKERB_INTERNAL_NAME PrincipalName,
IN OPTIONAL PUNICODE_STRING PrincipalRealm,
IN OPTIONAL PUNICODE_STRING RequestRealm,
IN OPTIONAL PUNICODE_STRING TgtClientRealm,
IN ULONG NameFlags,
IN BOOLEAN bRestrictUserAccounts,
OUT PBOOLEAN Referral,
OUT PUNICODE_STRING RealmName,
OUT PKDC_TICKET_INFO TicketInfo,
OUT PKERB_EXT_ERROR pExtendedError,
OUT OPTIONAL SAMPR_HANDLE * UserHandle,
IN OPTIONAL ULONG WhichFields,
IN OPTIONAL ULONG ExtendedFields,
OUT OPTIONAL PUSER_INTERNAL6_INFORMATION * UserInfo,
OUT OPTIONAL PSID_AND_ATTRIBUTES_LIST GroupMembership
)
调用KdcNormalize
时的相关参数中最重要的就是SourceCName
因为我们是在利用S4U2Self
协议请求自身的ST,所以SourceCName
也就是自身的名字WINSRVSERVER
kd> dt SourceCName
Local var @ 0x327f9e0 Type _KERB_INTERNAL_NAME*
0x0016e920
+0x000 NameType : 0n1
+0x002 NameCount : 1
+0x004 Names : [1] _UNICODE_STRING "WINSRVSERVER"
之后在CheckSam
条件中会调用到KdcGetTicketInfo
来获取用户WINSRVSERVER
的相关信息
KerbErr = KdcGetTicketInfo(
&OutputPrincipal,
0, // no lookup flags means sam name
bRestrictUserAccounts,
NULL, // no principal name
NULL, // no realm name,
TicketInfo,
pExtendedError,
UserHandle,
WhichFields,
ExtendedFields,
UserInfo,
GroupMembership
);
此时OutputPrincipal
的值为WINSRVSERVER
,即我们自己的机器名DC
,目前仍一切正常
kd> dt OutputPrincipal
Local var @ 0x327f928 Type _UNICODE_STRING
"WINSRVSERVER"
+0x000 Length : 0x18
+0x002 MaximumLength : 0x1a
+0x004 Buffer : 0x0016e92c "WINSRVSERVER"
之后会调用SamIGetUserLogonInformation2
在SAM中查找对应的账户信息,但由于此时已经将创建的机器账号还原,所以并不能找到对应的账号,该函数会返回错误
但是系统并不会直接提示找不到账号,而是会在其后面添加'$'符号,将其作为机器账号再次查找
Status = SamIGetUserLogonInformation2(
GlobalAccountDomainHandle,
LookupFlags,
UserName,
WhichFields,
ExtendedFields,
&UserInfo,
&LocalMembership,
&LocalUserHandle
);
//
// WASBUG: For now, if we couldn't find the account try again
// with a '$' at the end (if there wasn't one already)
//
if (((Status == STATUS_NOT_FOUND) ||
(Status == STATUS_NO_SUCH_USER)) &&
(!IsValidGuid) &&
((LookupFlags & ~SAM_NO_MEMBERSHIPS) == 0) &&
(UserName->Length >= sizeof(WCHAR)) &&
(UserName->Buffer[UserName->Length/sizeof(WCHAR)-1] != L'$'))
{
Status = KerbDuplicateString(
&TempString,
UserName
);
if (!NT_SUCCESS(Status))
{
KerbErr = KRB_ERR_GENERIC;
goto Cleanup;
}
DsysAssert(TempString.MaximumLength >= TempString.Length + sizeof(WCHAR));
TempString.Buffer[TempString.Length/sizeof(WCHAR)] = L'$';
TempString.Length += sizeof(WCHAR);
D_DebugLog((DEB_TRACE, "Account not found ,trying machine account %wZ\n",
&TempString ));
Status = SamIGetUserLogonInformation2(
GlobalAccountDomainHandle,
LookupFlags,
&TempString,
WhichFields,
ExtendedFields,
&UserInfo,
&LocalMembership,
&LocalUserHandle
);
}
通过调试信息可以清晰的看到查找到的用户信息不再是WINSRVSERVER
而是变成了WINSRVSERVER$
也就是域控对应的机器账号UserId = 0x3ed
至此便完成了对于域控的欺骗,之后就是颁发ST的过程
kd> dt UserInfo
Local var @ 0x327f684 Type _USER_INTERNAL6_INFORMATION*
0x001602e0
+0x000 I1 : _USER_ALL_INFORMATION
+0x0c8 LastBadPasswordTime : _LARGE_INTEGER 0x0
+0x0d0 ExtendedFields : 0x18
+0x0d4 UPNDefaulted : 0 ''
+0x0d8 UPN : _UNICODE_STRING ""
+0x0e0 A2D2List : (null)
+0x0e4 RegisteredSPNs : (null)
+0x0e8 KeyVersionNumber : 5
+0x0ec LockoutThreshold : 0
kd> dx -id 0,0,89de1678 -r1 (*((KDCSVC!_USER_ALL_INFORMATION *)0x1602e0))
(*((KDCSVC!_USER_ALL_INFORMATION *)0x1602e0)) [Type: _USER_ALL_INFORMATION]
[+0x000] LastLogon : {0} [Type: _LARGE_INTEGER]
[+0x008] LastLogoff : {0} [Type: _LARGE_INTEGER]
[+0x010] PasswordLastSet : {0} [Type: _LARGE_INTEGER]
[+0x018] AccountExpires : {0} [Type: _LARGE_INTEGER]
[+0x020] PasswordCanChange : {0} [Type: _LARGE_INTEGER]
[+0x028] PasswordMustChange : {9223372036854775807} [Type: _LARGE_INTEGER]
[+0x030] UserName : "WINSRVSERVER$" [Type: _UNICODE_STRING]
[+0x038] FullName : "" [Type: _UNICODE_STRING]
[+0x040] HomeDirectory : "" [Type: _UNICODE_STRING]
[+0x048] HomeDirectoryDrive : "" [Type: _UNICODE_STRING]
[+0x050] ScriptPath : "" [Type: _UNICODE_STRING]
[+0x058] ProfilePath : "" [Type: _UNICODE_STRING]
[+0x060] AdminComment : "" [Type: _UNICODE_STRING]
[+0x068] WorkStations : "" [Type: _UNICODE_STRING]
[+0x070] UserComment : "" [Type: _UNICODE_STRING]
[+0x078] Parameters : "" [Type: _UNICODE_STRING]
[+0x080] LmPassword : "" [Type: _UNICODE_STRING]
[+0x088] NtPassword : ".?废??樾??" [Type: _UNICODE_STRING]
[+0x090] PrivateData : "." [Type: _UNICODE_STRING]
[+0x098] SecurityDescriptor [Type: _SR_SECURITY_DESCRIPTOR]
[+0x0a0] UserId : 0x3ed [Type: unsigned long]
[+0x0a4] PrimaryGroupId : 0x0 [Type: unsigned long]
[+0x0a8] UserAccountControl : 0x2100 [Type: unsigned long]
[+0x0ac] WhichFields : 0x27120005 [Type: unsigned long]
[+0x0b0] LogonHours [Type: _LOGON_HOURS]
[+0x0b8] BadPasswordCount : 0x0 [Type: unsigned short]
[+0x0ba] LogonCount : 0x0 [Type: unsigned short]
[+0x0bc] CountryCode : 0x0 [Type: unsigned short]
[+0x0be] CodePage : 0x0 [Type: unsigned short]
[+0x0c0] LmPasswordPresent : 0x0 [Type: unsigned char]
[+0x0c1] NtPasswordPresent : 0x1 [Type: unsigned char]
[+0x0c2] PasswordExpired : 0x0 [Type: unsigned char]
[+0x0c3] PrivateDataSensitive : 0x1 [Type: unsigned char]
至此,我们成功的请求的用户WINSRVSERVER
伪装成了域控自身WINSRVSERVER$
之后再I_GetTGSTicket
中,为了获得WINSRVSERVER
这个服务的相关信息,又再次调用KdcNormalize
,其中的流程与上述基本相同,这也就是漏洞的第二次利用。成功的将请求的服务从WINSRVSERVER
伪装成WINSRVSERVER$
完成上述的两次利用后,其他过程都显得不再重要,但有一点仍然需要留意,便是关于PAC的问题。
之前TGT中的PAC主体为WINSRVSERVER
,又是如何切换为申请的Administrator
的,对于之前的PAC又是如何处理的。
下面将对这两点进行分析
S4U2self
协议的意义是 服务器模拟用户向域控申请针对自身的ST,即给予用户访问服务的权限,所以返回的ST中应该插入的是用户的PAC,即下图中的(2)(3)两个过程
而上一步中我们申请的TGT中的PAC,是 不在下图中的Service1向KDC认证的过程 中颁发的PAC
明白了这点也就明白了为什么PAC会被替换
以下堆栈及函数完成了生成ST并向其中添加了用户PAC
kd> kb
# ChildEBP RetAddr Args to Child
00 0327f9ac 61ba4b9b 0327fb48 0327fea8 0327fea0 KDCSVC!I_GetTGSTicket+0x313
01 0327fe44 61ba1901 00160958 000c5020 0327feb8 KDCSVC!HandleTGSRequest+0x77f
02 0327fee0 61bae51e 0327ff30 00160958 00160968 KDCSVC!KdcGetTicket+0x25e
03 0327ff34 70d173e6 00160940 00000562 00000000 KDCSVC!KdcAtqIoCompletion+0x15f
04 0327ff58 70d18808 00000562 00000000 00084df4 NTDSATQ!ATQ_CONTEXT::IOCompletion+0x53
05 0327ff84 70d189f2 00000000 00000562 00084df4 NTDSATQ!AtqpProcessContext+0x3c2
06 0327ffb8 77e41be7 abcdef01 00000000 00000000 NTDSATQ!AtqPoolThread+0xbd
07 0327ffec 00000000 70d18935 abcdef01 00000000 kernel32!BaseThreadStart+0x34
KerbErr = KdcGetS4UTicketInfo(
S4UTicketInfo,
&OldServiceTicketInfo, // tgt's account info.
&S4UClientUserInfo,
&S4UClientGroupMembership,
pExtendedError
);
...
KerbErr = BuildTicketTGS(
ServiceTicketInfo,
RequestBody,
SourceTicket,
Referral,
S4UTicketInfo,
CommonEType,
&NewTicket,
pExtendedError
);
...
KerbErr = KdcInsertInitialS4UAuthorizationData(
&EncryptedTicket,
pExtendedError,
S4UTicketInfo,
S4UClientUserInfo,
&S4UClientGroupMembership,
((ServiceTicketInfo->UserId != DOMAIN_USER_RID_KRBTGT) &&
((ServiceTicketInfo->UserAccountControl & USER_INTERDOMAIN_TRUST_ACCOUNT) == 0)),
pKeyToUse
);
对于原本的TGT中的PAC并没有做任何处理,直接将其丢弃了。
本文介绍了CVE-2021-42278
和CVE-2021-42287
的漏洞背景,并从系统层面详细分析了漏洞成因,其关键点在于S4U2self
过程中的欺骗。
https://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc4120.txt
https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/openspecs/windows_protocols/ms-sfu/1fb9caca-449f-4183-8f7a-1a5fc7e7290a
https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/openspecs/windows_protocols/ms-sfu/aceb70de-40f0-4409-87fa-df00ca145f5a
https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/openspecs/windows_protocols/ms-kile/ae60c948-fda8-45c2-b1d1-a71b484dd1f7
https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/openspecs/windows_protocols/ms-pac/c38cc307-f3e6-4ed4-8c81-dc550d96223c
本文由 Seebug Paper 发布,如需转载请注明来源。本文地址:https://paper.seebug.org/1904/