Critical infrastructure facilities operated by the private and public sectors face a complex and continuously growing web of security threats that are compounded by the increasing convergence of information and operational technology (OT) in this area.

Trustwave SpiderLabs’ just released 2024 Public Sector Threat Landscape: Trustwave Threat Intelligence Briefing and Mitigation Strategies report highlights these challenges by disclosing how threat actors attack critical infrastructure and offers recommendations that operators can adopt to make their facilities more secure and resilient.

The convergence of IT and OT systems presents novel security hurdles. Many organizations erroneously assume their OT systems are immune to cyber threats due to being air-gapped, which has led to lax attitudes towards patching and updating legacy systems.

The Threat

We can see the result of critical infrastructure operators worldwide being under-prepared from a security standpoint in the almost endless string of attacks that have recently taken place. The Center for Strategic & International Studies lists dozens of attacks against infrastructure and political targets. These include:

• March 2024: Iranian hackers compromised an IT network connected to an Israeli nuclear facility. Hackers leaked sensitive facility documents but did not compromise its operational technology network.
• September 2023: Iranian hackers launched a cyberattack against Israel’s railroad network. The hackers used a phishing campaign to target the network’s electrical infrastructure. Brazilian and UAE companies were also reportedly targeted in the same attack.
• November 2023: Denmark suffered its largest cyberattack on record when Russian hackers hit 22 Danish power companies.

The Challenges

Trustwave SpiderLabs’ elite team of researchers noted in the report how the diverse nature of the entities involved in the ownership and management of these facilities, which range from small local utilities to federal agencies, impact their security preparedness.

Adding to the problem is many critical infrastructure systems are decades old and may or may not have been updated recently, often due to cost concerns, making them even more susceptible to attack. Finally, cybersecurity isn’t always a high priority for critical infrastructure owners; instead, ensuring the service remains available is job number one.

These systems are also interdependent, meaning a disruption in one sector, like power or water delivery, can have cascading effects on others, causing widespread outages and hardships for citizens.

Another side effect of the system’s age is that a facility tends to become a hodgepodge of non-standardized equipment, generally due to the plant being updated or added to over the years. This unwieldy creation is, in fact, a perfect example of how many critical infrastructure operators prioritize operational capacity over security. Using disparate parts and systems creates additional security gaps because they were not designed to work together but to enable the facility to continue operating.

Moreover, integrating IT and OT systems gives rise to fresh avenues for cybercriminals to exploit. Often, these systems lack proper segmentation, granting attackers unhindered movement within networks. Moreover, reliance on third-party vendors for services opens doors to security vulnerabilities, as these entities can be manipulated or compromised.

Furthermore, the escalating adoption of machine-to-machine communication in critical infrastructure introduces new concerns regarding physical security. Attackers can potentially exploit these automated systems. The merging of IT and OT systems compounds these risks, as they were not originally designed with robust security measures.

Here are just a few of the OT/IT security issues disclosed in the report:

• Limited Asset Management: Organizations often lack a comprehensive understanding of their OT environment. They may not have a complete inventory of all systems and their configurations, making it difficult to identify vulnerabilities and implement proper safeguards.
• Patching Challenges: Legacy OT systems often present unique patching difficulties. These systems may be one-of-a-kind and critical to operations, making downtime for patching risky.
• Resilience and Response: Building redundancy into critical infrastructure systems is crucial for maintaining resilience in the face of cyberattacks. Having multiple systems allows for continued operation if one system is compromised.

Trustwave’s Threat Intelligence Report Library

The Public Sector report is just the latest in a series researched and published by Trustwave SpiderLabs. Please visit these for an in-depth analysis of the security issues facing each industrial sector.

• 2024 Education Threat Landscape: Trustwave Threat Intelligence Briefing and Mitigation Strategies
• Trustwave SpiderLabs' 2024 Technology Threat Landscape: Trustwave Threat Intelligence Briefing and Mitigation Strategies
• 2023 Manufacturing Threat Landscape: Trustwave Threat Intelligence Briefing and Mitigation Strategies
• 2023 Retail Sector Threat Briefing and Mitigation Strategies
• 2023 Financial Services Sector Threat Briefing and Mitigation Strategies
• 2023 Hospitality Sector Threat Landscape: Trustwave Threat Intelligence Briefing and Mitigation Strategies
• Cybersecurity in the Healthcare Industry: Actionable Intelligence for an Active Threat Landscape

Please download the 2024 Public Sector Threat Landscape: Trustwave Threat Intelligence Briefing and Mitigation Strategies for all the background details on these threats, the groups behind them, and how to properly defend your public sector organization.

Latest Trustwave Blogs